How your real estate assets can provide a big payoff to charity

How your real estate assets can provide a big payoff to charity

With the richest men in the world such as Bill Gates, Warren Buffett and Mark Zuckerberg giving away their fortunes, you may wonder whether you have similar options and what the tax benefits would be.

Chase Magnuson, director of the Planned Giving Department-Real Estate at George Washington University  and co-author of “The Secret Power Behind Real Estate Donations,” said giving away property can be tricky if not done correctly.

Nearly 2 million qualified charities “reject over $15 billion in real estate donations annually because they are unable or unwilling to assess and accept the real estate risk,” Magnuson said. But he added that when real estate agents, CPAs, property managers, appraisers, risk managers, title attorneys and other consultants “are brought onto the team, the donation success rate increases dramatically.”

There are several strategies for giving your property away and obtaining beneficial tax treatment. An outright gift is easily accomplished and provides the maximum and earliest financial benefit for the charity, while providing you with the maximum tax benefit. You are able to deduct the gifted property’s full appraised value against 30 percent of your adjusted gross income. If you are unable to use the entire deduction in one year, you can carry that deduction forward for an additional five years.

Another strategy is the “bargain sale.” A bargain sale is when you sell your property to the charity at a price below the property’s appraised fair market value. In return, you can take a charitable deduction for the difference between the sales price and the appraised value. That deduction from this gift portion can often be used to offset the exposure to capital gains tax on the property’s sale portion.

If you wish to sell your property but do not wish to donate it all, there is another option to receive charitable benefits: You may donate an undivided fractional interest in your property to a charity, at which point, typically, you and the charity cooperate in marketing and selling the property.

At the closing, net sales proceeds are distributed to you and the charity based on the respective ownership shares. You are entitled to a charitable deduction based on the ownership percentage you donate (sometimes adjusted to reflect the minority discount rule that provides that a minority interest is worth less than a majority interest). Since this strategy does not require the charity to come up with upfront cash to purchase the property, it is often the charity’s preferred strategy vs. the bargain sale.

There are even strategies that will allow you to donate your property, receive the charitable deduction and an income stream for life. These strategies utilize a charitable gift annuity (CGA) or a charitable remainder unitrust (CRUT).

Your income stream is based on several factors, including your property’s appraised value, the expected net sales proceeds realized when the property is sold, your age, your life expectancy, and the prevailing interest rate discount factor that takes current market interest rates and the money’s time value into consideration.

CRUTs vary slightly in that they are established by placing your property in a trust, then selling it to establish an asset on which a fixed percentage is paid to you for life. A percentage, these days, typically 5 to 7 percent, is then paid out to you for your lifetime or for as many years as you select.

So, for example, assume 30 years ago you bought property costing $50,000. It is now appraised at $550,000. Assume you paid off the mortgage, so it is now debt-free. When you sell it for the appraised value, you will pay a real estate agent $33,000 in commissions, and $15,950 in transfer and recordation taxes. Your net sales proceeds will be $501,050. Assuming a 5 percent annuity rate, the charity will pay you $2,087 monthly for the remainder of your life.

“These strategies can be combined into hybrid strategies to customize the donation to suit the donor, the charity and to assure strict compliance with the detailed IRS rules and regulations,” Magnuson said. “You can even retain a life estate allowing you to live in your property for life  and still complete a tax advantaged gift.”

Harvey S. Jacobs is a real estate lawyer with Jacobs & Associates Attorneys at Law in Rockville. He is an active real estate investor, landlord, settlement attorney, lender and associate real estate broker. This column is not legal or tax advice and should not be acted upon without obtaining your own legal counsel. Contact Harvey at (301) 417-4144, www.jacobs-associates.com, or ask@thehouselawyer.com.

Montgomery Co. considers controversial bill requiring home sellers to test for radon

Montgomery Co. considers controversial bill requiring home sellers to test for radon

By Harvey S. Jacobs October 30, 2015

In Maryland, home sellers who know that their homes have elevated radon levels are required to disclose that information to prospective buyers. However, at present, home sellers have no duty to measure the radon levels in their homes.

That could change in Montgomery County if the County Council approves a controversial bill that would mandate radon testing.

Bill 31-15, sponsored by Council members Craig Rice (D-Upcounty) and Sidney Katz (D-Gaithersburg-Rockville), would require home sellers to test their homes for radon and provide the results to prospective home buyers before entering a sales contract. If the bill is enacted, Montgomery County would become the only jurisdiction in the country to mandate radon testing.

Radon has been a known carcinogen for decades.

It is odorless, colorless, tasteless, resides in your basement and kills 21,000 homeowners a year.

Radon is a radioactive gas that occurs naturally in decaying rocks, water and soil, and it enters your home through cracks or other openings in the foundation. Although radon is found naturally indoors and outdoors, its characteristics cause it to be found in higher concentrations in a home’s lowest level.

The Environmental Protection Agency has determined that a high concentration of radon, meaning four or more picocuries per liter of air (pCi/L), increases the risk of lung cancer among homeowners who have never smoked. According to the American Association of Radon Scientists and Professionals, the EPA’s figure of 21,000 annual deaths from radon comes from a 20-year-old study of miners exposed to radon.

The bill would require every home seller to purchase a state-mandated testing kit, use a state-certified testing company and provide test results to prospective buyers before signing a sales contract. In addition, if tests reveal a high radon level, the seller would be required to get a written estimate from a state-licensed remediation company detailing the costs to reduce the radon level to 2 pCi/L. The tests cannot be conducted more than one year before a sales contract is signed. According to the National Radon Proficiency Program, there are 23 remediation providers in Maryland.

It is beyond debate that radon is a serious concern for the public. But the solution proposed by the Montgomery County Council members will increase sellers’ costs while having precious little practical effect. The bill neither mandates remediation nor identifies the penalty for failing to comply. The bill does not cover common-ownership communities such as condominiums, apartments or cooperatives. And it does not address the hundreds of thousands of occupied homes that may have dangerously high levels of radon but are not for sale €” and thus the homeowners/occupants are at continued lung cancer risk.

The Greater Capital Area Association of Realtors has submitted written testimony opposing the bill. The association asserts that its members already go to great lengths to educate the public about radon, and its official Radon Testing Notice and/or Addendum refers clients to the EPA’s Web site, atwww.epa.gov/radon , for information.

The Realtors also cited the increased costs, added complexity and confusion likely to ensue if this bill becomes law. The test kits cost approximately $40, but locating a state-certified testing laboratory, arranging for ideal testing conditions (rain, snow and excessive drafts can all affect the test results), and, if necessary, locating and obtaining a written estimate for remediation and completing that remediation can increase transaction costs by several thousand dollars.

Realtors also are concerned that the bill, if enacted, would be likely to delay closings while buyers, sellers and lenders wait for remediation to be completed because there are only 23 qualified licensed remediation companies statewide.

Finally, the Realtors cite the inevitable costly lawsuits that would arise from conflicting test results, allegations of easily manipulated testing conditions and/or other failures to strictly comply with the vague law. A more prudent approach would be to require an educational disclosure that would help buyers make a more educated decision and then leave the negotiation up to the buyer and seller in the private real estate transaction whether a radon test and remediation should be done,€ said Meredith R. Weisel, GCAAR government relations consultant.

The bill is to go before the council for a vote Tuesday, Nov. 3.

Harvey S. Jacobs is a real estate lawyer with Jacobs & Associates Attorneys at Law in Rockville. He is an active real estate investor, developer, landlord, settlement attorney, lender and Realtor. This column is not legal advice and should not be acted upon without obtaining your own legal counsel. Contact Jacobs at (301) 417-4144, jacobs@jacobs-associates.com or ask@thehouselawyer.com.

 

How to figure out the value of your home

How to figure out the value of your home

By Harvey S. Jacobs June 25, 2015

I co-own a rowhouse in the hot U Street area with my ex-partner. He wants to buy me out of the property which has appreciated quite a bit since we purchased it in 2001. My ex has proposed a selling price. When I ask how he determined it, the response was, I’ve been watching the market.

With his new mortgage, there will be an appraisal but that doesnt give me much comfort. I’ve been told that in a hot, fast-paced real estate market like D.C., appraisers cant keep up with the value because of the lag in available comparables. It was suggested that a real estate agent who knows the area would have a better idea of the house value. I shared that suggestion with my ex but he didnt think it was necessary. Any suggestions?

Co-Owner

Pricing a home in todays market is a challenge. Pricing is part science, part art. It sounds like you intend to sell your interest for its fair market value. Fair market value is often defined as the price that a willing buyer, under no compulsion to buy, is willing to pay to a willing seller, under no compulsion to sell.

An experienced real estate agent in your neighborhood will be an essential resource for you and your ex-partner. The real estate agent will provide you with a comparative market analysis (CMA) which will tell you what the other comparable homes sold for over the past several months. They can determine if prices are trending up or down, and by how much.

Agents can tell you how long those comparables remained on the market. They can determine if those prices were affected by unusual external factors, such as: extreme weather, or government sequestration. Active real estate agents will know how contract terms and conditions impact their sellers bottom line.

In the current market, buyers often ask for, and receive, up to 3 percent purchase price concession from sellers at settlement. Finally, the savvy agent will be able to provide you with his gut feeling about the steps you need to take to maximize your sale price and minimize your days on the market.

If you are more the science type, I highly recommend you consult the District of Columbias Real Property Assessment Divisions Appraisers Reference Materials 2016 (ARM). This 148-page report is a valuation data treasure trove.

It is available online athttp://otr.cfo.dc.gov/sites/default/files/dc/sites/otr/publication/attachments/Binder2016finaldraftnumbered.pdf.

The report is broken down into sub-neighborhoods and provides guidance to the Districts appraisers on how to value literally all the factors which determine the assessed value. Assessed value is determined by the District on an annual basis in order to assess and collect real property taxes.

This approach takes vast amounts of data into account and assigns values to all major housing elements. For example, it values the second full bath at $12,500; each additional half bath at $8,125; a fireplace at $8,000; a finished basement will be valued at $55 per square foot; an open porch increases your homes value by $22 per square foot, whereas a fully enclosed porch fetches $55 per square foot in additional assessed value.

Even floor coverings can cause your assessed value to vary widely. Carpet adds $2.17 per square foot to your homes base value, whereas ceramic tile adds a whopping $8.53 per square foot, even more than hardwood, which the District values at $7.17 per square foot.

The main drawback to relying on assessed value to determine fair market value is that the data used by assessors for taxation purposes can be somewhat dated. The 2016 ARM data is based on closed sales through year-end 2014. The other drawback is the fact that District assessors do not field inspect every property every year.

If the scientific approach appeals to you, but you do not want to do your own number crunching, you can always hire an independent appraiser to do that for you. The costs are nominal at about $450. Most appraisals can be completed in a week or so. Your independent appraiser will have the market data, and your cooperation in allowing him to carefully inspect all the interior improvements that you have made over the years.

No home pricing discussion is complete without addressing online valuation Web sites such as Trulia or Zillow. These sites historically have had an abysmal error rate (between 18 and 32 percent) for their online, computer-generated valuation.

Recently, they have taken steps to increase their accuracy by entering into agreements which allow them to get near real-time data directly from the various multiple listing services.

As recently as June 10, they were still reporting an overall 8.3 percent median error rate nationwide. As Zillows own site says the Zestimate isnt intended to replace a real estate professionals opinion of value.

Harvey S. Jacobs is a real estate lawyer with Jacobs & Associates-Attorneys At Law, LLC in Rockville. He is an active real estate investor, developer, landlord, settlement attorney, lender and Realtor. This column is not legal advice and should not be acted upon without obtaining your own legal counsel. Contact Harvey at (301) 417-4144 Jacobs@Jacobs-Associates.com or Ask@thehouselawyer.com.

 

Taking a stand against an unsatisfactory hardwood floor

By Harvey S. Jacobs June 12, 2015

We have lived in our newly built townhome for a little over one year. The builder advertised it as luxury, upscale and high-end.

We have had numerous problems, but the biggest one is the hardwood flooring. The flooring was an issue from day one, and we probably should not have closed on the home after the final inspection. The subcontractor for the flooring has verbally agreed to replace the hardwood. It is Bruce engineered flooring, and we did pay for the upgraded version. We are hesitant to replace it with the same product.

Can we insist on a different product? If it is at a higher price, can we make the builder eat the additional cost?

The Bruce flooring product was the builder’s choice. Should we hire an independent hardwood floor expert?

Any advice will be appreciated. Replacing the floor on two levels of our home will be a big and inconvenient endeavor.

D.K.

I have handled wood-flooring cases. We used an expert witness in one case to prove that the flooring that was installed was not what had been selected. We also proved that the manufacturer’s installation method was not followed and caused warping and cupping.

In your case, it appears that unless the flooring is somehow not what you selected, is defective or was installed improperly, you may be liable for the cost of replacing it. Sales promotions using words such as luxury, elegant or high-end are not enforceable. The courts call those sales efforts merely puffery, and the builder cannot be held to such subjective criteria.

Check your contract to see whether it covers your situation. Most new-home contracts allow the builder to substitute materials for any or no reason. If defects in workmanship or materials are the issue, then check your new-home warranty promptly. Often new-home warranties will require you to make any claims within one year.

If your flooring subcontractor has already agreed orally to replace the hardwood, get that in writing. Make sure the writing addresses who is responsible for the materials, labor, warranty, the time frame, any necessary permits and the disposal of the old materials. Finally, make sure that subcontractor is licensed, bonded and insured.

Harvey S. Jacobs is a real estate lawyer with Jacobs & Associates Attorneys at Law in Rockville. He is an active real estate investor, developer, landlord, settlement attorney, lender and Realtor. This column is not legal advice and should not be acted upon without obtaining your own legal counsel. Contact Jacobs at (301) 417-4144 or e-mail jacobs@jacobs-associates.com or ask@thehouselawyer.com.

 

Nasty neighbor? Here’s how to sue him.

By Harvey S. Jacobs April 23, 2015

I am a Realtor and recently sold a townhome to a nice young family. They have learned that there is a very abusive neighbor who has made their lives a living hell. He shows up at their door with his German shepherd dog and yells at them for no apparent reason. He is loud, boisterous and very intimidating.

Police have been called several times. Peace orders have been obtained, but the behavior continues. Now they are thinking about just selling and moving elsewhere. We have a few questions. First, can they sue the neighbor for their damages if they sell at a loss and/or for moving and other expenses? Second, can they sue the previous owner/seller for failing to disclose this well-known abusive neighbor?

Finally, if they do list their home for sale, do they have to disclose this abusive neighbor? -JW

It appears that your client may be able to sue his neighbor for causing a private nuisance, trespass and possibly assault.

Nuisance, as a legal theory, has been recognized since 1066. In its present evolution, the courts define private nuisance as: unreasonable or intentional conduct that causes substantial and unreasonable injury or interference with another ‘s use and enjoyment of his real property.

A court will decide if the nasty neighbor ‘s actions are reasonable. For example, courts have found that regularly playing a radio so loud that it could be heard in the house next door was unreasonable. If the nasty neighbor regularly appears at your client ‘s front door with his German shepherd in tow and intimidates your client without provocation, this conduct could easily be ruled unreasonable and certainly intentional.

That this intimidation takes place on your client ‘s property could support a trespass claim. Trespass occurs when, without consent, one enters onto another ‘s property in an unlawful manner. Unlawful manner means the trespasser has no legal right to be on the property. To establish no consent, the police often advise homeowners to post the property with a No Trespassing sign.

The courts will next examine whether the nasty neighbor ‘s unreasonable conduct has caused your clients substantial and unreasonable injury. If the court finds that because of the aggressive neighbor your client reasonably fears coming and going through his own front door then it could establish substantial injury.

In addition, if your client believed that he was in imminent risk of bodily injury from his neighbor and/or his dog and believed that the neighbor possessed the ability to make good on that threat, then it is a civil assault.

Once your client proves he is the victim of a private nuisance, trespass and/or assault, he can ask the court to prohibit the nasty neighbor from continuing his behavior. He can also request monetary damages for all losses caused by the nuisance, including the diminution in the property value and for any physical or mental injury. Assuming the nasty neighbor ‘s conduct is found to be outrageous or malicious, punitive damages are also available.

Whether your client can sue his seller for failing to disclose this nasty neighbor is a gray area. Many sales contracts have adopted a caveat emptor (let the buyer beware) approach. In those cases, the courts may rule that it was up to the buyer to knock on the neighbor ‘s doors to investigate. Depending upon the contract language, and the seller ‘s actual knowledge, the seller may not have had a duty to disclose. Unlike the failure to disclose a known but latent property defect, the existence of a nasty neighbor is not a property defect.

The Realtor ‘s Code of Ethics provides that Realtors shall avoid exaggeration, misrepresentation, or concealment of pertinent facts relating to the property or the transaction. Realtors shall not, however, be obligated to discover latent defects in the property, or to advise on matters outside the scope of their real estate license.

But if your client decides to sell, the safest approach is to disclose. By disclosing, he cannot later be accused of hiding the nasty neighbor from his own buyer. If that disclosure causes him monetary damage, then he can sue the neighbor to recover those damages.

He will have to prove that the decrease in property value is directly related to the nasty neighbor – a difficult but not impossible burden of proof.

Harvey S. Jacobs is a real estate lawyer with Jacobs & Associates Attorneys at Law in Rockville. He is an active real estate investor, developer, landlord, settlement attorney, lender and Realtor. This column is not legal advice and should not be acted upon without obtaining your own legal counsel. Contact Jacobs at (301) 417-4144, jacobs@jacobs-associates.com or ask@thehouselawyer.com.

 

House Lawyer | How tenants can use eviction law to target bad landlords

By Harvey S. Jacobs March 19, 2015

When one hears the word eviction, one might conjure images of a sheriff’s deputy and a moving crew showing up at a rental property and forcibly depositing the tenant’s possessions at the curb.

But there is another, lesser known type of eviction, a constructive eviction, which is used by tenants to avoid the lease terms. Landlords and tenants alike need to be aware of the legal theory behind it.

Constructive eviction occurs when the landlord allows the property to deteriorate to such an extent that it becomes uninhabitable. Constructive eviction can also arise when a property is rendered uninhabitable by a natural disaster – such as a fire or a flood and the landlord cannot promptly repair the damage. Constructive eviction claims most often arise as a defense in a landlord-tenant action.

Generally speaking, if there is a written lease that calls for the tenant to pay rent and the tenant fails to pay, a court will enter a judgment for the landlord. One of the few reasons a court will excuse the tenant’s obligation to pay rent is that the property is rendered uninhabitable.

Minor problems or temporary circumstances that inconvenience the tenant will not rise to the level of a constructive eviction. Broken elevators or clogged toilets, if fixed within a reasonable time, will not support a tenant’s defense of constructive eviction. If repairs are possible but the landlord refuses to make them or delays making them, a court can order an interim remedy short of declaring a constructive eviction.

A court can order the tenant to pay his rent into a court registry, which is not released to the landlord unless and until all necessary repairs are made. If the landlord still fails to make necessary and timely repairs, the court can allow the tenant to use his rent to pay for repairs.

Because of the ramifications of a constructive eviction such as allowing the tenant to cancel the lease and make no rent payments courts will accept this defense only in the most serious circumstances. For example, courts have found a constructive eviction to exist when heat, potable water and sanitary facilities were lacking for a prolonged period.

To successfully assert the constructive eviction defense, the tenant must abandon the property within a reasonable period. What is reasonable is whatever the courts say is reasonable. Courts have found an abandonment occurring within a month of the event allegedly causing a constructive eviction to be reasonable.

Conversely, when a tenant did not abandon the property until a year had elapsed, that was held to be an unreasonable abandonment. Similarly, abandoning the premises after the lease expired was held to be an unreasonable abandonment. In those cases, the courts refused to find that a constructive eviction had occurred.

Constructive eviction can also be used affirmatively by a tenant. This can occur when a tenant sues the landlord for breach of the tenant’s covenant of quiet enjoyment. All leases contain an implied covenant of quiet enjoyment, which does not necessarily have anything to do with the decibel level at the property or whether the tenant is actually enjoying the property.

This poorly named doctrine guarantees the tenant’s right to use the property for the purposes the tenant intended. When prevented from enjoying such use, the tenant may sue the landlord for breaching the covenant. If the court agrees, it will declare the lease breached by the landlord and allow the tenant to terminate the lease without penalty.

Tenants assume a significant risk when using the constructive eviction defense or when suing for breach of the covenant of quiet enjoyment. Because the tenant must abandon the premises to satisfy the requirements for a constructive eviction, if the claim is not accepted by the court, the tenant will have abandoned the property but will still be liable for the payment of all rent for the entire lease term.

In light of this risk, tenants should think very carefully before using these legal theories.

Harvey S. Jacobs is a real estate lawyer with Jacobs & Associates Attorneys at Law in Rockville, Md. He is a real estate investor, developer, landlord, settlement attorney, lender and Realtor. This column is not legal advice and should not be acted upon without obtaining your own legal counsel. Contact Jacobs at (301) 417-4144, jacobs@jacobs-associates.com or ask@thehouselawyer.com.